Template-Type: ReDIF-Paper 1.0 Series: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers Creation-Date: 2020-08-11 Revision-Date: 2021-12-01 Number: 20-049/IV Author-Name: Bouke Klein Teeselink Author-Workplace-Name: Yale School of Management Author-Name: Martijn J. van Assem Author-Workplace-Name: Vrije Universiteti Amsterdam, Tinbergen Institute Author-Name: Dennie van Dolder Author-Workplace-Name: Vrije Universiteti Amsterdam, Tinbergen Institute, University of Essex Title: Does Losing Lead to Winning? An Empirical Analysis for Four Sports Abstract: Berger and Pope (2011) show that being slightly behind increases the likelihood of winning in professional (NBA) and collegiate (NCAA) basketball. We extend their analysis to large samples of Australian football, American football, and rugby matches, but find no evidence of such an e ect for these three sports. When we revisit the phenomenon for basketball, we only find supportive evidence for NBA matches from the period analyzed in Berger and Pope. There is no signiffcant e ect for NBA matches from outside this sample period, for NCAA matches, or for matches from the Women's NBA. High-powered meta-analyses across the di erent sports and competitions do not reject the null hypothesis of no e ect of being slightly behind on winning. The confidence intervals suggest that the true effect, if existent at all, is likely relatively small. Classification-JEL: D01, D91, Z20 Keywords: competition, sports, motivation, performance, regression discontinuity File-URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/20049.pdf File-Format: application/pdf File-Size: 773.667 bytes Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20200049