Template-Type: ReDIF-Paper 1.0 Series: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers Creation-Date: 2006-09-28 Number: 06-082/1 Author-Name: Randolph Sloof Author-Email: r.sloof@uva.nl Author-Name: Hessel Oosterbeek Author-Email: h.oosterbeek@uva.nl Author-Name: Joep Sonnemans Author-Email: j.h.sonnemans@uva.nl Author-Workplace-Name: University of Amsterdam Title: On the Importance of Default Breach Remedies Abstract: Theory predicts that default breach remedies are immaterial whenever contracting costs are negligible. Some experimental studies, however, suggest that in practice default rules do matter, as they may affect parties' preferences over contract terms. This paper presents results from an experiment designed to address the importance of default breach remedies for actual contract outcomes. We find that default rules do have an influence. The reason for this is not that contract proposals and/or responses are biased towards the default, but rather that parties often disagree over what the best contract is and therefore end up with the default.

This discussion paper has resulted in a publication in the Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 163(1) 5-22. Classification-JEL: K12; C91 Keywords: breach remedies; default remedies; experiments File-Url: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/06082.pdf File-Format: application/pdf File-Size: 181381 bytes Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20060082